Wanted: Pilot(s) behind the Singapore Flier.

"I was shocked when I saw the flier. I think it is not appropriate for such content to be circulated this way. It's one thing seeing such things on the Internet, but another seeing the hard copy."

~~ Ms K.C. Ong, an administrator in her 40s who read the flier on Tuesday [06-Apr-2010], said she called and informed the PAP headquarters and alerted the media later.

Reference: Jacob 69er

This IHT article costs SGD160k

Davinder Singh, the lawyer acting for the leaders, told Reuters that the IHT's publisher, editor of global editions, and the article's author, Philip Bowring, also agreed to pay damages of S$60,000 to Lee Hsien Loong, and S$50,000 each to Goh Chok Tong and Lee Kuan Yew, as well as pay their legal costs.

~~~ Reuters, 24 Mar 2010.

All in the Family

By PHILIP BOWRING

HONG KONG — Are political dynasties good or bad?

Election time in the Philippines is a regular reminder of the roles that feudal instincts and the family name play in that nation's politics. Benigno Aquino, son of the late President Corazon Aquino, is the front runner to succeed President Gloria Arroyo, daughter of Diosdado Macapagal, a president in the 1960s.

Senate and Congressional contests will see family names of other former presidents and those long prominent in provincial politics and land-owning.

But the Philippines is not unique. Dynastic politics thrives across Asia to an extent found in no other region apart from the Arabian peninsula monarchies.

The list of Asian countries with governments headed by the offspring or spouses of former leaders is striking: Pakistan has Prime Minister Asif Ali Zardari, widower of Benazir Bhutto, herself the daughter of the executed former leader Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Bangladesh has Sheikh Hasina, daughter of the murdered first prime minister, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman . In Malaysia, Prime Minister Najib Razak is the son of the second prime minister, Abdul Razak. Singapore's Lee Hsien Loong is Lee Kuan Yew's son. In North Korea, Kim Il-sung's son Kim Jong-il commands party, army and country and waiting in the wings is his son Kim Jong-un.

In India, the widow Sonia Gandhi is the power behind the technocrat prime minister, Manmohan Singh, and her son Rahul is showing political promise and being groomed in the hope of leading the Congress party and eventually filling the post of prime minister, first occupied by his great grandfather Jawaharlal Nehru.

In Japan, Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama is the scion of a Kennedy-like political dynasty: His father was a foreign minister, and his grandfather was a prime minister.

Indonesia's last president, Megawati Sukarnoputri, is the daughter of its first, and family ties could well play in the next presidential election when the incumbent, President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, must retire. In Myanmar, the durability of the opposition to the military owes much to the name of Aung San Suu Kyi's independence-hero father as well as to her stoicism.

Thailand lacks obvious political dynasties but that is likely because there is already a monarch. South Korea's rough and tumble democracy would seem to leave little scope for dynasties but even there, the political career of Park Chung Hee's daughter, Park Geun Hye, has benefited much from her father's reputation.

With the exception of North Korea, Asian dynasties are a phenomenon of countries that are more or less democratic.

In China, family connections help immensely but the party is still a relatively meritocratic hierarchy. Vietnam is similar. In the Philippines, it is easy to blame dynastic tendencies for the nation's stark economic failures. But its problems go much deeper into the social structure and the way the political system entrenches a selfish elite. It is a symptom not the cause of the malaise.

In India, the Gandhi name has been an important element in ensuring that Congress remains a major national force at a time when the growth of regional, caste and language based parties have added to the problems of governing such a diverse country. In Bangladesh, years of fierce rivalry between Sheikh Hasina, daughter of one murdered president and widow of another, have been a debilitating factor in democratic politics. But their parties needed their family names to provide cohesion and without them there could have been much more overt military intervention. Ms. Megawati was a poor leader but just by being there helped the consolidation of the post-Suharto democracy.

Dynasties can be stultifying too. In Malaysia, the ruling party was once a grassroots organization where upstarts like former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad could flourish but over time it has become a self-perpetuating patronage machine. Too many of the key players are the offspring or relatives of former leaders.

There are more fundamental problems, too. Most current Asian dynasties trace themselves to the post-1945 political transformation. In that sense they have become a crutch, reflecting a failure to devise systems for the transfer of power to new names, faces and ideas.

Dynasties are a poor commentary on the depth of democracy in their countries. Without parties with a coherent organization and a set of ideas, politics becomes about personalities alone and name recognition more important than competence. Parties run by the elite offspring of past heroes easily degenerate into self-serving patronage systems.

So dynastic leadership in Asia's quasi-democracies can provide a focus for nations, a glue for parties, an identity substitute in countries that used to be run by kings and sultans. But it is more a symptom of underlying problems than an example to be followed.

Sometime you gain, sometime you lose

Singapore budget for FY2009: SGD 43.44b.
As of Sep 2008, GIC managed assets: estimate SGD225b (well over USD100b).
As of 31 mar 2008, Temasek Holdings net portfolio value: SGD185b.

If we assume total asset value is SGD410b.
Then in the last financial year, Temasek lost more than SGD40b can represent almost one year of national expenditure or 10% of total asset.

Legally correctness

"We have to act because they are alleging corruption... If we do not act, and the lies and defamation are repeated throughout and in election rallies and spread around, I think the government's reputation goes down. And its standing must go down and it must lose its moral authority to govern, because these statements have been made and you've not reacted and that means there must be some truth in it,"

~~ Lee Hsieng Loong, Prime Minister, 22 April 2006.

NOTE: Look for pictures of bronze heads in Google search here.

Taiwan's MRT and us.

"There are only two persons who pay when it comes to public transport fares. One, I use — I pay. Or two, I use — you help me subsidise my ride. What happens when you subsidise my rides? That means the taxpayers are now paying. ..The money still must come from somewhere, right? It is about a 1.5 percentage point increase of your GST. So, now it is 7%. You want it to be free, do you want the GST to go up to 8.5% to run a completely free bus and train system?"


~~ Raymond Lim, Transport Minister, at a dialogue session with MacPherson residents, 21 Dec 2008.

Here is an article titled "Why Taipei’s MRT trumps Singapore’s" appeared in The Edge Singapore on 22 Dec 2008, written by Sunita Sue Leng.
Sunita previously an associate editor at The Edge Singapore, is now based in Taipei and writes on Greater China issues.




TAIPEI’S CITY Hall is so proud of its mass rapid transit (MRT) system that it runs a competition every year, asking people to send in poems about the MRT. I can see why. The MRT is clean and comfortable (in addition to chewing gum, the nasty habit of betel chewing nut has been banned). People queue up in a civilised fashion before boarding trains. And, when the doors open, they don’t barge in before passengers can exit.

Signs and announcements are in Chinese and English and all carriages have electronic displays showing which station is coming up next. Every carriage has special seats for old folks, pregnant women or people with disabilities. I’ve never seen fit, young people pretending to be asleep in these seats.

However, the best part about Taipei’s MRT is its frequency. According to Taipei Rapid Transit Corp (TRTC), the company that runs the system, trains arrive at two to four-minute intervals at peak hours. Off-peak, it is four to seven minutes.

In reality, it is much more frequent. I know because I’ve timed it. At peak hours, trains come as often as every minute. As for off-peak hours? Well, I’ve never had to wait more than three or four minutes. As a result, even during the morning rush hour, the trains are never as packed as they are in Singapore.

TRTC has won praise not just locally but internationally. It has been ranked No 1 for reliability for four straight years (2004 to 2007), according to the Nova/CoMET International Railway Benchmarking Group (of which Singapore’s SMRT Corp is also part).

All this got me wondering just how TRTC is able to deliver such a world-class MRT service. Perhaps, it doesn’t have to transport as many people as in the crowded Lion City? Perhaps, it’s government-owned and isn’t under pressure to make as much money as possible and can run more trains?

So, I pulled up some numbers (see table). And the broad conclusion is that Taipei proves it is possible to offer a high-quality, high-frequency and affordable MRT service without losing money. It also suggests that certain services, such as public transport, tend to function optimally as natural monopolies and ought not to be owned by companies that seek to maximise profits.

Let’s look first at the one common element between the two: the cost of taking a train. Average ticket prices in Singapore and Taipei are about $1. This is pretty low by international standards, as anyone who has had the misfortune to take the London Underground knows.

Singapore and Taipei are also pretty dense cities, but the latter packs more folks (5.5 million of them) into a smaller area (272 sq km). In comparison, Singapore is home to 4.6 million residents spread over some 692 sq km.

As such, in terms of coverage, Singapore’s network of five MRT lines is more extensive, totalling 109.4km, versus TRTC’s 74.4km network. However, TRTC has more stations on its smaller network, which means less distance between stations and greater convenience for commuters.

Just how many people take the MRT each day? In 2007, Singapore’s MRT moved an average of 1.56 million people a day. That’s just over a third more than what TRTC transported last year. So yes, TRTC’s network is smaller and it moves fewer people, which is one reason it feels less crowded.

However, what is illuminating is the difference in frequency. Last year, TRTC made an average of 2,171 train runs a day. SMRT clocked in at just over 1,000 a day for its fiscal year ended March 2008. This is not strictly an apples with apples comparison. SMRT’s system is older, has heavier loads and travels further than TRTC’s — factors which play a role in how often trains can be run. The comparison also doesn’t include data from SBS Transit, which runs the North- East Line. But, as SMRT accounts for more than four fifths of total MRT ridership, it is fairly representative of the whole picture.

Since February this year, SMRT has added about 900 extra train trips each week. According to the company, on average, its train frequency during peak hours is between two and five minutes. During off-peak hours, it is now between 3.5 and seven minutes. Given the existing signalling system and infrastructure, its average peak-hour frequency puts it among the top 20% of the world’s major metro operators, SMRT adds.

Still, it’s safe to assume that its bumped-up frequency continues to lag TRTC’s. And this, to an extent, is reflected in SMRT’s bottomline, which is much heftier than TRTC’s. In FY2008, SMRT’s rail operations saw revenue of $436.9 million. Earnings before interest and tax was $129.3 million. In comparison, TRTC saw approximately $415 million in fare revenue in 2007 and just $41.3 million in pre-tax profit.

TRTC is 73.75% owned by the Taipei City Government. The Ministry of Transportation and Communications owns a further 17.14% while the Taipei County Government owns 8.75%. Clearly, public-listed SMRT’s returns on its rail operations are far better for its shareholders than TRTC’s. However, TRTC — which has been profitable every year except its first two — is better for its commuters, who have been inspired to pen a poem or two in praise of their well-regarded metro.

COI report on Mas Selamat's escape.

“Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by incompetence”

~ Napoleon Bonaparte.


Its indeed a farce.

Why the opposition did not fare well in the parliament session on 21-Apr-2008?

The speaker may have the questions that is going to be asked beforehand.

CPF and Longevity Insurance

"Our families are getting smaller. We are working out support systems to help families raise their children. Ageing is a growing issue, those over 65 is increasing.

We have to have more of the over 60’s at work. The CPF drawdown age or retirement age will have to move up to life expectancy minus 20 years so that CPF need last for only 20 years. Legal age for retirement will have to go up from 62 to 65 and to 67. Eventually all those healthy and able to work, should be able to work regardless of age."

~~ Lee Kuan Yew, at the Tanjong Pagar 42nd National day celebration Dinner, 17 Aug 2007, 8.15 pm.

According to fellow blogger Goh Meng Seng, one motivation to defer the people from drawing out their saving funds from CPF is the increasing pressure of payout as more and more people reaching their draw-down eligibility age from 10 years time.

Let's check some statistic figures.

Here is the distribution of Singapore residents population by age group from the Singapore Department of Statistics :




We have a snapshot of similar data from the CPF site:



It seem to make sense but it would be exaggerating to expect similar scene below at the CPF buildings island wide:

Recent talk of the town about longevity insurance, which was previously called annuity, was hotly debated in the Parliament.

The SingaporeDaily did a good aggregator job and gave us a glimpse of what goes round in the House with those YouTube videos.

Came across a comment from Rock^Star at SGForum which prompted me to look up some statistics to support their argument.

Cue population prospect from UN Population division. This is the projection of life expectancy at birth during different period of time.

Singapore
Life expectancy at birth by sex (years)
Medium variant
1950-2050

Period	Both sexes combined	Male	Female
1950-1955	60.4	58.8	62.1
1955-1960	63.2	61.5	64.9
1960-1965	65.8	64.1	67.6
1965-1970	67.9	66.0	70.0
1970-1975	69.5	67.4	71.8
1975-1980	70.8	68.6	73.1
1980-1985	71.8	69.2	74.6
1985-1990	73.6	71.1	76.2
1990-1995	75.8	73.9	78.3
1995-2000	77.2	75.1	79.3
2000-2005	78.8	76.8	80.8
2005-2010	80.0	78.0	81.9
2010-2015	80.6	78.6	82.6
2015-2020	81.2	79.2	83.2
2020-2025	81.8	79.8	83.8
2025-2030	82.4	80.4	84.4
2030-2035	83.0	80.9	85.0
2035-2040	83.5	81.5	85.6
2040-2045	84.1	82.0	86.1
2045-2050	84.6	82.6	86.7

This is how I interpret the table: if you are born around the time 1950 to 1955, your life expectancy is 58.5 for male and 62.1 for female.

Similarly if you are the same age with our young nation, your life expectancy is 66 for male and 70 for female. Hence most of your peers will live till around the life expectancy age. While you may outlive them, if you are consider lucky/unlucky.

There is one flaw in the projection. That is the decreasing of mortality rate due to better medical care or healthier living through the years.

Nevertheless, our leaders liked to plan ahead. Hiking GST (medicine to help the poor and fund Workfare, infrastructure costs pertaining to an ageing population) while the economy is good; And proposing annuity payout beginning from age 85 is another good example.

While an ex Chief of an local insurance firm has proposed a more acceptable plan which may worth a look by the government.

Finally, it is interesting to note that NMP Siew Kum Hong's arguments on annuity proposal rang more sense than majority during Parliament.

Perhaps our expectation is a tad higher since the annoucement of civil service pay raise. And we hope FreeMan's perception is further from the truth.

We do not need sweet talk and we believe we can handle the plain truth.

Potemkin Village

"..You have one man, one vote, and it's not working in the Philippines, because you can't get rid of a president who is corrupt, because he's had more than one half of the senators unwilling to impeach him, despite all the evidence. And even in jail, he's got supporters outside. You need a certain standard of literacy, moral and ethical values, to be able to run a one man, one vote system."

~~ Lee Kuan Yew, during an interview with PBS.

Our country is not invited to the Community of Democracies Ministerial in Bamako on mid November 2007 as reported by Singabloodypore

Despite our country's affluence and efficiency, we are still considered not democratic enough by the western world.

Maybe they do not know about the free press being widely circulated over here, the likes of 我报 and Today.

So how does the international community see our prosperous, democratic society?
To get some insight, maybe we have to read some of the reports from them:

1. International Advisory Committee country report
2. Freedom house country report
3. Amnesty International news

If you can find money to kill people, you can find money to help people.

"What democracy did is to give the poor a vote. And it moves power from the market place to the polling station; from the wallet to the ballot."

~~ Tony Benn, former UK MP and minister.

Kudos to both Decentguy1 and Disgruntled for sharing these interesting clips.

There we watched a Taiwanese talk show (in mandarin cum hokkien dialect) commenting our democracy system. You are unlikely to find that being telecast in our national TV.

You may be more familiar with some of the arguments presented in the show if you regularly surf around the local socio-political blogosphere.

The next video is pretty enlightening about the history of democracy:

Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5

While we savour the show, we have to ask ourselves this question: what is the price of democracy?

Le HongYi Fracas

"..the term ‘white horse’ was used to identify sons of influential persons to ensure that such enlistees were not given preferential treatment, and that medical classification and vocational assignment are scrupulously fair."

~~ Cedric Foo, ex Minister of State for Defence, 12th Nov 2003, explaining the classification for national servicemen in the Singapore Armed Forces, alleged for according certain special privileges to.

A junior Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) officer mass-mailed his letter of complaint to the top management in SAF, not forgetting to copy almost everyone else in some of the organization's internal mailing lists and was reprimanded for breaking the chain of command.

This caused an outbreak of discussions, be it online or around coffee tables recently.

He was touted as a self-less whistle blower. It is admirable he has the guts to speak up against the behemoth and escalate his grievance to the people up there.

But one little thing proves unfavorable against our princely hero.
He is the son of our leader.
He is supposed to be one of the elites.
That distant him a little bit from the common mass.

Then there were the critics of the young conscript, whom was considered brash and haughty for his action.

I would like to highlight some interesting points, beside the heavy local accent, found in come-back-kid, Rockster's blog .

It amazed me how careless and reckless some of our SAF officers are and was prompted to cast some doubt on them holding up the plots of our nation's defence.

To end this with a note of lighter mood, please enjoy Mr Brown's podcast.

Somber Irony

手术很成功,不过病人已经死了。

~~ 电影 《流氓医生》 (梁朝伟饰) 的一句台词。


I was filled with a sense of injustice after viewing Channel 8 News video about a mother losing her life after giving birth recently.

Is this a case of bureaucracy directly or indirectly causing harm to the common people?

According to our leader, we have an efficient health care service, albeit one which is not free, that is expected to be top class in the world.
Why would saving a person's life be obstructed by red tape?

However there are always two sides to every coin.

The concerned hospital has shed some light on the tragic event from their perspective in the official press and it is suggested the mother was suffering from complications after giving birth and the medical staff had put in their best effort to save her.

The official news reports can be found in CNA and TodayOnline.

Thoughts during a sleepless night

"The cure for all this talk is really a good dose of incompetent government... your asset values will disappear, your apartments will be worth a fraction of what it is, your jobs will be in peril, your security will be at risk and our women will become maids in other persons' countries - foreign workers."

~~ Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew in Sydney 04 Apr 2007 [1], referring to argument about justification for ministerial pay hike.



Recently the name Steve Chia was back in the limelight, being mentioned among netizens' discussion on ministerial pay raise issue. [2]

It seems that he was putting in good effort as a Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) during the period 2001 to 2006, raising interesting issues in the House for the people after all.

His brushes in his personal life might have brought him down to earth and cost him some support in the 2006 General Election (GE).

It was ironical that some of us remembered more of the man's bottom than his heart.


****************

After reading Mr Wang's heartfelt posting [3] , names like James Gomez, TT Durai and Chee Soon Juan somehow flashed across my mind.

Gomez, seemingly prone to error, is back working in Sweden after the GE 2006. I supposed he can be considered as a foreign talent by the Swedes.
Will he come back and face the fire again?

Facing legal prosecution for an offense under the Prevention of Corruption Act certainly did not do any harm to Durai 's ability to provide marketing consultancy services to several firms [3] .

Similarly, Chee with a reputation for political deviance, should have no problem finding a stable job and good living abroad or perhaps locally.
Why put yourself through the trouble and create a scene barking at the Iron Tree?


****************

I came across an articel [5] by blogger, Pandemonium. It gives an insightful read about minister selection process and a way to regulate popular behavior towards unpopular policy.

Some sacrifices are more equal than others.

"The mystery of where the milk went to was soon cleared up. It was mixed every day into the pigs' mash. The early apples were now ripening, and the grass of the orchard was littered with windfalls. The animals had assumed as a matter of course that these would be shared out equally; one day, however, the order went forth that all the windfalls were to be collected and brought to the harness-room for the use of the pigs. At this some of the other animals murmured, but it was no use. All the pigs were in full agreement on this point.. ..Squealer was sent to make the necessary explanations to the others.

‘Comrades!’ he cried. ‘You do not imagine, I hope, that we pigs are doing this in a spirit of selfishness and privilege? Many of us actually dislike milk and apples. I dislike them myself. Our sole object in taking these things is to preserve our health. Milk and apples (this has been proved by Science, comrades) contain substances absolutely necessary to the well-being of a pig. We pigs are brainworkers. The whole management and organisation of this farm depend on us. Day and night we are watching over your welfare. It is for your sake that we drink that milk and eat those apples. Do you know what would happen if we pigs failed in our duty? Jones would come back! Yes, Jones would come back! Surely, comrades,’ cried Squealer almost pleadingly, skipping from side to side and whisking his tail, ‘surely there is no one among you who wants to see Jones come back?’

~~ Excerpt from Animal Farm: A Fairy Story, a novel by George Orwell, released in 1945.


Prime MinisterLee Hsien Loong mentioned one of the reasons for raising the Goods and Services Tax (GST) from 5% to 7% (starting from Jul 2007) was to have extra resources to fund social programs like Workfare later on. The aim was to strengthen the safety nets and tilt the balance in favour of the lower-income groups and the elderly, not to increase their burdens.

Are we neglecting the resources required for the ministerial pay hike?


Term I learnt today:

Molon Labe (mo-lone lah-veh)

Greek for "come and take it". It was the response of King Leonidas I of Sparta to Xerxes I of Persia at the onset of the Battle of Thermopylae, asking if they would lay down their arms.

Ministers' Pay: An International Issue

"Low salaries will draw in the hypocrites who sweet talk their way into power in the name of public service, but once in charge will show their true colour, and ruin the country."

~~ Minister Mentor, Lee Kuan Yew.




I flipped through the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index and noticed that 4 countries have consistently fared above us each time from 2001 through 2006.

They are Denmark, Finland, Iceland and New Zealand.

Comparing in-corruptible official to another in the apple-to-apple sense, will be a logical direction to head when dealing with their remuneration package.

How about our ministers should be paid 2/3 of their counterparts’ salaries in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and New Zealand?

I presumed the income tax rate in European countries (3/4 of countries above us in CPI ranking) are much higher than ours here.

I have not research on the salaries of government ministers in those countries.

I hope someone can enlighten me.



Reference:

1. Transparency International CPI
http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi

2. MM Lee speach to the National Trade Union Congress July 19 1996
http://www.fcpp.org/main/publication_detail_print.php?PubID=693

3. The picture on top is courtesy from Anonymous
Blogger Comment

4. Minister Pay benchmark 1994
SG Democrat
hkchital webby

Wayang

"As an East Asian looking at America, I find attractive and unattractive features. I like, for example, the free, easy and open relations between people regardless of social status, ethnicity or religion. And the things that I have always admired about America, as against the communist system, I still do: a certain openness in argument about what is good or bad for society; the accountability of public officials; none of the secrecy and terror that's part and parcel of communist government."

~~ Lee Kuan Yew in an interview with Fareed Zakaria, March/April, 1994.

The haze has cost our country USD50 millions economically, reported by CNA. Hopefully it will soon be cleared by end of this month.

At the mean time, you may check out the PSI reading at NEA website.

While we are being smoked out, Singapore Media Watch highlighted the response from our Environment Minister to a press release from an opposition party leader, urging our government to act on the smokey issue.

A few other blogger sites also posted their takes on this:

• conformityisdead


• Kitana

The full press release and how local press reported it can be found here:-

1. Full press release at WP Website


2. Straits Times


3. TODAY Online

Here are some of my observations:

• You must be constantly providing suggestion/feedback to every policy and every problem there is, or else you will be regarded as trying to score point or opportunistic when you come up with one.


• Being equipped with the solution is the precursor of engaging the government with regards to certain problem.


• If you find the progress of the work on a problem unsatisfactory, please be assured that the goverment has put in their best effort dealing with it and there is no one else better in handling it.

Reference:

i. Fareed Zakaria website

ii. Definition of wayang.

The Andy Xie Incident

"In a different world we need to find a niche for ourselves, little corners where in spite of our small size we can perform a role which will be useful to the world. To do that, you will need people at the top, decision-makers who have got foresight, good minds, who are open to ideas, who can seize opportunities like we did. ... My job really was to find my successors. I found them, they are there; their job is to find their successors. So there must be this continuous renewal of talented, dedicated, honest, able people who will do things not for themselves but for their people and for their country. If they can do that, they will carry on for another one generation and so it goes on. The moment that breaks, it's gone."

~~ Lee Kuan Yew, in an interview with CCTV on June 12 2005, stressed the need to have a continuous renewal of talent in the country's leadership.

Mr Wang gets a step ahead of me in seeing something interesting in the recent news. You can catch a glimpse here.

Back in July 2006, there was an unflattering article on our country's state in becoming a regional/global financial hub. The point is revisited in one of our neighbour's news interactive website this month.

A leaked email message from AsiaPacific economist Andy Xie, critical of our little island economic progress for past decade, might have sparked the community attention on the issue. A few people, including Andy himself, lost their jobs as an aftermath.

We are not so sure if his comments come with a tinge of nationalistic sentiment. However there is no smoke without a fire and this article (take note of the 8th paragraph) in a South Korean internet news could give an idea of how far off is Andy's parting shot.

Term I learnt today:

Money laundering

is the practice of engaging in financial transactions in order to conceal the identity, source and destination of the money in question.

洗钱

Conspiracy Theory

In ten days time will be the 5th anniversary of the 911 Incident.
An Oliver Stone movie, WTC, set during that period, will be out soon.

There are rumours that the incident is not what it seems.
Suggestions of it actually being staged by the US government have been around for some time.
There is no way Uncle Sam will inflict such a heavy bodily wound just to go to war, most might say.

Anyone heard of Operation NorthWood?
It was a plan to generate public support for military action against the Cuban government of Fidel Castro drafted by the top US military leaders in 1962. It was not implemented at that time though.

Recently American actor Charlie Sheen came out and cast doubts on the official story concerning the incident. Try googled/yahooed it and you may not find any respectable news sites carry it.

Here are a few places that talked about it:-

1. Alex Jones' Infowars site.
2. Alex Jones interviews Martin Sheen.
3. A video clip on what could have hit Pentagon at this OdinPatrick blog.
4. Free Press International on 911.
5. A comprehensive while oddly organised Alexander James blog.

Rabid Dog

The leader of genius must have the ability to make different opponents appear as if they belonged to one category.

~~ Adolf Hitler


Chee Soon Juan is someone local people love to hate. He proclaims to be a hard-core democrat and appears to champion the cause for human rights in our little island.

These ideas are not so appealing to the popular mass who are embroiled in the Rat Race, where proletarian livinghood and materialistic gratification remain high up on our to-do-list.

His ferventness and pertinacious stand on such ideals do not win him too many fans, and certainly do not win too many lawsuits as well when he is perceived to have stepped out of line from time to time. Hence he is rarely depicted in the best light by the local media.

He is a trained neuropsychologist while heard some people call him something along the line of a rabid dog.

His interview with a foreign publication has landed the publication with a libel suit recently.

Some lights on his own recent lawsuit:-

SingaporeDemocrat

Today Online

Word I learnt Today:

bourgeois

n., pl. bourgeois.

1. A person belonging to the middle class.
2. A person whose attitudes and behavior are marked by conformity to the standards and conventions of the middle class.
3. In Marxist theory, a member of the property-owning class; a capitalist.

adj.

1. Of, relating to, or typical of the middle class.
2. Held to be preoccupied with respectability and material values.

中产阶级的, 中产阶级, 资产阶级

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

"Right now we have Low Thia Khiang, Chiam See Tong, Steve Chia. We can deal with them. Suppose you had 10, 15, 20 opposition members in Parliament. Instead of spending my time thinking what is the right policy for Singapore, I'm going to spend all my time thinking what's the right way to fix them, to buy my supporters votes, how can I solve this week's problem and forget about next year's challenges?"

~~ Lee Hsien Loong at Lunchtime Election Rally, 3rd May 2006.

"When I call a man openly, you're a liar, you're dishonest, and you do not dare to sue me, there's something basically wrong. And I will repeat it anywhere and you can't go and say, oh, I have apologised; let's move on. Can you commit a dishonourable -- maybe even one which is against the law -- an illegal act and say, let's move on because I've apologised? You may move on but you're going to move on out of politics in time."

~~ Lee Kuan Yew commenting on James Gomez, an opposition candidate during rally, 30th April 2006

There are a number of people who had moved on, either out of politics or out of the country.

He who was voted in by the people and thrown out of paliament by the authority.
He who stands un-wavered in the face of bankruptcy and marginalization, with the belief that what he is standing for is worth the trouble.
One Joshua Benjamin Jeyaretnam.
He even has a blog.

His fellow comrade, Tang Liang Hong, had a short but eventful political career as well.
He has 13 defamation suits against him alone.
His story mimic twists and turns of typical TV drama.
His impact on deteriorating relations between two neighbouring countries can be found here.

Another quitter from paradise goes by the name Francis T. Seow.
The former Solicitor General of Singapore has been critical of our judicial system.
Perhaps that gave us a glimpse of why he was ousted.
Today he remains in touch with affairs in his homeland and gives his view from afar.

Finally, we have this foreign economist, Christopher Lingle, who fled the country after being questioned for publishing this.

They are some better known names. The list is far from exhaustive.
Today, I hope the list does not grow any further.
I hope.

Word I learnt today:

in absentia
adv.

While or although not present; in absence: was tried and convicted in absentia.

审判等的缺席

Distorted truths?

"First...you attack only those whom your Special Branch can definitely say are communists. They have no proof except that X told Z who told Alpha who told Beta who told the Special Branch. Then you attack those whom your Special Branch say are actively sympathising with and helping the communists, although they are not communists themselves. Then you attack those whom your Special Branch say, although they are not communists or fellow travellers, yet, by their intransigent opposition to any collaboration with colonialism, they encourage the spirit of revolt and weaken constituted authority and thereby, according to the Special Branch, they are aiding the communists. Then finally, since you have gone that far, you attack all those who oppose you...

The first time there may be pangs of conscience, a sense of guilt. But once embarked on this course with constant repetition you get more and more brazen in the attack. All you have to do is to dissolve organizations and societies and banish or detain the key political workers in these societies. Then miraculously everything is tranquil on the surface ..Then an intimidated press and the government-controlled radio together can regularly sing your praises, and slowly and steadily the people are made to forget the evil things that have already been done, or if these things are referrred to again they're conveniently distorted and distorted with impunity, because there will no opposition to contradict."

~~ Lee Kuan Yew, speaking in the Legislative Assembly against the arbitrary executive powers of the colonial state, Oct 4, 1956

I came across a few websites that contain precious little information of what's wrong with our precious little island.

I am smart enough to differentiate between diatribe and constructive criticism, between polemics and analysis. Whatever these mean.

For those who are not smart enough, please avoid reading them.

1. Won't Get Fooled Again by Anon.

2. 9 reasons why Singapore is a Pathetic Place by Hemlock.

3. Pushing for babies by Sara Webb.

The reason why I include the 3rd webby is the mention of relaxing of ethics quota of HDB flats, which interests me.

I hope I can get one soon.

Words that I learnt today:

diatribe
n

Bitter or angry attack in speech or writing.

恶骂, 诽谤

polemics
n. (used with a sing. or pl. verb)

1. The art or practice of argumentation or controversy.
2. The practice of theological controversy to refute errors of doctrine.

辩论, 争论